Editorial:
[ML Update A CPIML Weekly News MagazineVol. 22 | No. 12-13 | 26 March – 1 April 2019]
Christchurch Massacre and the Global Rise of Islamophobic and Far-Right Terror
The horrific murders of 50 people who were at prayer in two
mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand by a white supremacist terrorist has left
people across the world shocked, grief-stricken and angry. It has also
confirmed that a global network of white supremacists is now a major
international terrorist threat, all the more sinister because they are gaining
not only inspiration but tacit approval from the US government and other
far-right regimes.
Emergency vigils and protests were held around the world where
speakers expressed their pain and sorrow at this massacre of defenceless
people, many of whom had gone to New Zealand to escape war and brutality.
Those who lost their lives were Muslims from all over the world – as well as
five from India, they originated from Egypt, Palestine, Bangladesh, and
elsewhere. They were of all ages - a woman shielding her wheelchair-bound
husband, an adoring grandfather who rescued many before he himself was killed,
young children just three and four years old.
As well as these tributes, there has been an outpouring of
anger at the corporate media - exemplified internationally by Newscorp owned by
Australian media tycoon Rupert Murdoch - which with its vicious daily doses of
Islamophobia and racism has nurtured the far-Right and amplified its messages.
After Christchurch it has continued in the same vein by humanising not the
victims but the killer - portraying him as having been an 'angelic boy' who was
bullied at school. In Britain, the BBC invited the white supremacist group
Generation Identity to their Newsnight programme after the massacre and allowed
them to present their world view.
This international corporate media, of course, speaks on
behalf of, and in conjunction with, imperialism and global capital. It has been
the standard bearer for the so-called War on Terror which was the pretext for
US invasions in Afghanistan and Iraq, and subsequently for the ‘regime change’
rhetoric which sought to justify interventions in Libya and most recently
Syria. These new colonial wars led to countless deaths of Muslim women, men and
children, leaving their countries destroyed with infrastructure torn down and
cities levelled. These wars were, needless to say, fought so that global
capital could plunder the resources of these countries. At the same time they
have established a global discourse of Islamophobia which has created the
tropes of Muslims as terrorists, for example, no matter that there is now ample
evidence that it was the US and its allies which created and funded terrorists
from Al Qaeda to ISIS; or the trope of the brutal hyper-sexual Muslim male from
whose clutches Muslim women were to be liberated by the white men of
imperialism.
We have seen in recent years the emergence of a string of
neoliberal fascist regimes whose leaders include Trump with his ‘Muslim ban’,
Israel’s Netanyahu with his daily gloating over killings of Palestinians,
Hungary’s Orban with his obsessive hatred for refugees, along with Modi. In
each of these, specific ideologies of hate intersect with a more global
Islamophobia. In each, fascist stormtroopers and semi-autonomous mass killers -
like the Christchurch terrorist - are approved and assiduously nurtured.
Other leaders like the UK’s Theresa May follow close behind.
May's government has imposed a so-called Hostile Environment policy which
particularly affects migrants and refugees from the very countries destroyed by
the War on Terror and more recently she has been revoking the citizenship of
Muslims who have been born in Britain and lived there all their lives.
Australia, the home of the Christchurch terrorist, is notorious for its violent
Islamophobia and racism, exemplified by its offshore prisons where refugees are
held in appalling conditions.
And though many people in New Zealand have expressed
disbelief that such attacks could happen on their relatively liberal soil, the
reality is that Muslims have been attacked there too by far-right thugs, and as
Maori activists remind us, the country is steeped in racist white settler
ideologies. Nevertheless, New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has shown
strong leadership in her response to the massacre, first expressing genuine
empathy and solidarity with the victims and survivors, epitomised in her phrase
‘they are us’, and subsequently taking decisive action to change gun laws and
further calling for a global fight against racism and right-wing extremism.
Jacinda Ardern's response to the Christchurch massacre has
been widely appreciated in India especially in stark contrast to the response
shown by Indian governments to such shocking instances of terrorist attack,
including the most recent incident in Pulwama where CRPF soldiers fell prey to
a suicidal terror attack. Modi never really took responsibility for the huge
security lapse that enabled the Pulwama attack nor did he show any of the
exemplary leadership qualities that we have seen in the New Zealand PM's
post-Christchurch intervention and articulation. Modi's reluctance to condemn
the Christchurch attacks, (despite the loss of Indian lives), which starkly
contrasted with his usual alacrity in personally tweeting about terror attacks
worldwide, has also been quite apparent. But then we know what can be expected
of the Modi government, for we cannot but remember how as Gujarat Chief Minister,
Modi himself had personally overseen one of the most horrific episodes of
large-scale anti-Muslim violence in India’s history, and how during his tenure
as India's PM since May 2014 he has systematically nurtured and promoted hate
and violence against the Muslim community, Dalits, and all dissenting voices,
and helped perpetrators of terrorism against Muslims and rationalists evade
conviction.
No comments:
Post a Comment